Parliament Urged to Decide on EU's Future Course

Parliament Urged to Decide on EU's Future Course

In the run-up to Vienna's upcoming local elections, the city's major political parties have outlined their positions on migration and integration, shedding light on a broad spectrum of perspectives. Among these parties, the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ), known for its far-right, national-conservative, and Eurosceptic stance, has taken a restrictive and nationalist approach to these issues.

The FPÖ, under the leadership of top candidate Dominik Nepp, has advocated for Vienna to become a capital of deportations and favours stringent asylum policies. They emphasise border control, limiting the number of asylum seekers, and opposing liberal refugee policies. This stance aligns with the populist and nationalist rhetoric seen in other European far-right parties, where migration is often framed as a threat to social cohesion and national culture.

In contrast, the Social Democratic Party (SPÖ) and the Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP), currently excluded from government coalition talks with the FPÖ at the federal level, generally advocate more inclusive policies on integration and asylum, although they still emphasise order and controlled migration.

The SPÖ typically supports social integration programs, protection of asylum seekers according to international law, and family reunification under human rights frameworks. On the other hand, the ÖVP usually stresses balanced policies that secure borders but provide pathways for integration and lawful asylum, with measures to ensure social benefits are fairly distributed.

When it comes to family reunification, far-right populist parties like the FPÖ typically seek to tighten conditions to prevent increases in immigration through this channel, advocating for stricter eligibility criteria and longer waiting periods. Meanwhile, the SPÖ and ÖVP generally support family reunification under human rights norms.

Regarding social benefits, the FPÖ and similar parties often propose limiting social benefits for migrants, tying welfare access to stricter residency or citizenship requirements, and prioritising native Austrians in benefit allocation. This aligns with their nationalist platform and opposition to what they consider “welfare tourism” by immigrants. In contrast, the SPÖ and ÖVP advocate for fair access to social benefits and inclusive welfare systems.

NEOS, another contender in the local elections, has called for a separate integration law for Vienna, with education being the key to social participation. They suggest that funding should only be provided if it's utilised, and propose that asylum seekers who commit crimes should lose their right to stay. The Greens, meanwhile, advocate for living together on equal terms, allowing every child to learn German early on while also maintaining their native language. They support neighbourhood centres and integration mentors, and view obtaining citizenship as a strong incentive for long-term integration.

Given the FPÖ’s electoral success in 2024 but their likely exclusion from government coalitions, Vienna’s local policies will probably reflect a compromise, with centrist parties maintaining more moderate integration and asylum policies while facing pressure from the FPÖ’s hardline stance.

The following table summarises the likely positions of the FPÖ, SPÖ/ÖVP, and NEOS on key policy areas:

| Policy Area | FPÖ Position | SPÖ/ÖVP Position (General) | NEOS Position | |----------------------|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| | Integration | Restrictive, nationalist, limited support | Inclusive, social programs for integration | Separate integration law, education key to social participation | | Asylum | Tight border controls, fewer asylum seekers | Lawful asylum, international protection | Asylum seekers who commit crimes lose right to stay | | Family reunification | Stricter conditions, reduced access | Supportive under human rights norms | Not specified | | Social benefits | Prioritize natives, restrict migrant access | Fair access, inclusive welfare systems | Tie welfare access to stricter residency or citizenship requirements |

For exact, detailed local election proposals by each party on these issues in Vienna, more specific campaign documents or recent local party platforms would be required. The existing evidence strongly indicates that the FPÖ advocates restrictive migration and integration policies, while centrist parties lean toward more balanced and inclusive frameworks.

1. The Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) has proposed a policy that aims to make Vienna a city for deportations and enforces strict asylum policies, favoring border control and limiting the number of asylum seekers.
2. In contrast, the Social Democratic Party (SPÖ) and the Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) advocate more inclusive policies on integration and asylum, although they maintain emphasis on order and controlled migration.
3. NEOS, another party in the local elections, emphasizes education as the key to social participation and has proposed a separate integration law for Vienna, while the Greens support equal citizenship rights, early German language education, and neighborhood integration centers.
4. Given the likely exclusion of the FPÖ from government coalitions, Vienna's local policies are expected to reflect a compromise between centrist parties maintaining more moderate integration and asylum policies while facing pressure from the FPÖ’s hardline stance.

Read also: