Skip to content

International Students at Harvard Barred from U.S. by Trump Administration's Decision

Administration's move marked by Harvard as an "illegal, retaliatory action infringing on Harvard's First Amendment rights," as stated in a Harvard declaration.

Administration's controversial move, as described by Harvard, is labeled as "another unlawful,...
Administration's controversial move, as described by Harvard, is labeled as "another unlawful, retaliatory action" that disregards Harvard's constitutional freedom of speech rights enshrined in the First Amendment.

International Students at Harvard Barred from U.S. by Trump Administration's Decision

In an unexpected move, US President Donald Trump threw a curveball at Harvard University on Wednesday, suspending for an initial six months the entry of foreign nationals seeking to study or participate in exchange programs. This decision was made amid an ongoing dispute between the Ivy League institution and the White House.

The proclamation, which justifies the ban on foreign students, revolves around national security concerns, implying a potential threat to American interests from the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based university. Harvard, upholding its integrity, slammed the proclamation as yet another "illegal retaliatory step taken by the Administration," alleging a blatant violation of Harvard's freedom of expression[1].

The six-month suspension, however, isn't set in stone. Trump's proclamation allows for extension beyond this period. The directive also orders the U.S. State Department to consider revoking existing academic or exchange visas for current Harvard students that meet the proclamation's criteria[1].

Just a week ago, a federal judge in Boston announced she would issue a broad injunction blocking the administration from revoking Harvard's ability to enroll international students, which constitute about a quarter of the university's student body[1]. Despite this judicial decision, the administration has continued its relentless pursuit against the nation's oldest and wealthiest university, with ongoing actions that include freezing billions of dollars in grants and other funding, and proposing to end its tax-exempt status[1].

Harvard asserts that the administration has been targeting the university in response to its refusal to yield control over the school's governance, curriculum, and faculty and students' ideology[2]. The university even took legal action, suing after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced her department was revoking Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification in late May[2].

However, the department later reverted its decision and pledged to challenge Harvard's certification through a longer administrative process[2]. Nonetheless, a U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs asserted she would issue a longer-term preliminary injunction at Harvard's urging, stating it is necessary to provide some protection to Harvard's international students[2].

In an internal cable seen by Reuters, the State Department ordered all consular missions abroad to intensify the vetting process for visa applicants seeking to attend Harvard for any purpose[3]. On Wednesday, the Trump administration issued a brief directive stating that Harvard has "demonstrated a history of concerning foreign ties and radicalism" and has "extensive entanglements with foreign adversaries," particularly China[3].

The FBI has expressed concerns about foreign adversaries exploiting access to American higher education for their benefit. The ban on Harvard students signifies the government's attempt to limit intelligence, research, and propaganda infiltration from foreign sources[3]. However, it remains unclear whether these national security concerns are directly linked to Harvard's activities or a broader crackdown on international education[3].

Stay tuned for the upcoming developments in this high-stakes game between Harvard and the Trump administration.

[1] Source: U.S News & World Report[2] Source: The New York Times[3] Source: Foreign Policy[4] Source: Bloomberg News

Bonus Insights

  • Trump's proclamation applies to F, M, and J visas which encompass student and exchange visas[2]
  • The Department of Homeland Security's revocation of Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification was temporarily blocked by US District Judge Allison Burroughs[2]
  • With the influx of international students, Harvard contributes about $4 billion annually to the Massachusetts economy[1]
  • Over 70 Nobel Prize winners have taught and/or studied at Harvard University[2]
  • The U.S. introduced the Immigration and Nationality Act in 1952, which established the criteria for temporarily barring foreign nationals from entering the U.S.[3]
  1. The proclamation issued by President Donald Trump suspends the entry of foreign nationals seeking education or participation in exchange programs at Harvard University for an initial six months, citing national security concerns as justification.
  2. In education-and-self-development news, the ongoing dispute between Harvard University and the White House has led to the suspension of foreign students and the potential revocation of existing visas for current Harvard students.
  3. Politics and general-news outlets continue to report on the ongoing actions taken against Harvard University, including the freezing of billions of dollars in grants and the proposal to end its tax-exempt status.
  4. Crime-and-justice coverage suggests that the administration's actions against Harvard may be a response to its refusal to yield control over the school's governance, curriculum, and faculty and students' ideology.
  5. In a broader context, the ban on Harvard students signifies the government's attempt to limit intelligence, research, and propaganda infiltration from foreign sources, particularly China, raising concerns about the potential impact on travel, history, entertainment, news, and overall relations between the U.S. and other countries.

Read also:

    Latest